In today’s world, the paradox of leadership is more apparent than ever.
We want to be inspired by great leaders and we want them to understand the big picture, be mindful of different leadership styles, be aware of their blindspots, and expand their leadership skills. We also expect them to handle conflicting demands easily and embody contradictory traits, all while maintaining high standards of performance. This balancing act is no easy feat, as the role of leaders is both a double-edged sword and an opportunity for tremendous growth. Leadership is full of apparent contradictions, where leaders must navigate between short-term needs and long-term vision, assertiveness and empathy, decisiveness and collaboration, and a host of other contradictions that I’ve listed below. This is the essence of Leadership Paradoxes—an ongoing challenge for leadership teams and anyone who serves in a leadership role today.
List of Leadership Paradoxes
We expect a lot from our leaders. We want our leaders to be:
- Confident and Humble
- Decisive and Inclusive
- Visionary and Practical
- Strong and Compassionate
- Strategic and Adaptable
- Assertive and Empathetic
- Focused and Open-Minded
- Results-Oriented and People-Centered
- Firm and Flexible
- Direct and Diplomatic
- Risk-Taking and Risk-Aware
- Calm under Pressure and Urgent in Action
- Long-Term Thinker and Responsive to Immediate Needs
- Autonomous and Collaborative
- Authoritative and Approachable
- Self-Assured and Open to Feedback
- Optimistic and Realistic
- Detail-Oriented and Big-Picture Focused
- Innovative and Respectful of Tradition
- Decisive and Thoughtful
- Self-Sufficient and Reliant on Others
- Charismatic and Grounded
- Confident in Strategy and Ready to Pivot
- Passionate and Objective
- Fast-Moving and Patient
- Structured and Creative
- Competitive and Collaborative
- Results-Driven and Process-Focused
- Self-Driven and Servant to the Team
- Ambitious and Content with Progress
- Strong Visionary and Attentive to Detail
- Unwavering in Values and Adaptable in Execution
- Goal-Oriented and Enjoying the Journey
- Outspoken and a Great Listener
- In Control and Willing to Let Go
- Disciplined and Open to Exploration
- Efficient and Deliberate
- Confident in Expertise and Open to Learning
- Commanding and Caring
- Predictable and Willing to Surprise
- Driven and Balanced
- Data-Driven and Intuitive
- Protective of Team and Demanding of Results
- Fast-Paced and Reflective
- Vulnerable and Resilient
- Encouraging Growth and Accepting of Limits
- Innovative and Consistent
- Persuasive and Willing to Be Persuaded
- Ambitious and Mindful of Burnout
- Confident in Leading and Comfortable Following
Reviewing this list helps you understand the role of paradoxical leadership in shaping organizations. Future leadership development research on the effect of paradoxical leadership can help us understand how leaders can navigate such conflicting demands and foster adaptability. Human Resource Management professionals can help us embrace paradoxes and stay grounded while adapting to the fast-changing demands of organizational culture and team members. This new perspective is crucial as leadership training evolves to meet the challenges of today’s complex landscape.
What do others say about the paradox of leadership?
Leadership scholars like Tim Elmore, Blair Sheppard, and others have extensively studied the paradoxes of leadership. Harvard Business Review has also explored how paradox theory and paradoxical leader behavior influence both organizational culture and individual-level outcomes. Leadership is no longer just about possessing technical skills or being a strategic executor, and no one gets away with a simple conceptual model of leadership. Highly effective leadership requires a mindset that embraces paradoxical thinking. Leaders must hold opposing truths and thrive in the space between these contradictions to excel at strategy and leadership.
Consider the yin-yang of leadership: it’s about embracing holistic thinking and understanding the underlying mechanisms of human behavior within organizations. This kind of paradox mindset is what separates good leaders from crappy ones. From the Humble Hero to the Globally-Minded Localist, leaders today are expected to form coalitions, strategize, and perform, all while managing people with compassion. They must be high-integrity politicians, skilled at balancing the conflicting demands of today.
In his book, Eight Paradoxes of Great Leadership, Elmore underscores the complexity of balancing these demands. Similarly, recent leadership books and book reviews on Organizational Behavior reveal the positive effects of adopting a paradoxical approach. Leaders who handle these conflicting demands are more likely to see improvements in task performance and organizational citizenship behavior, fostering both short- and long-term success.
Conclusion
In today’s world, great leadership requires much more than traditional good leader traits—it demands embracing the paradoxes that define the very nature of leadership itself. Leaders must engage in paradoxical thinking and take on the apparent contradictions that come with the territory. Only by accepting and thriving in this paradoxical space can leaders truly excel in their roles.